Legal Opinion
Montemayor v. Martin
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 24, 1986No. CIV-86-1392-APublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
ALLEY, District Judge.
Petitioner has applied to this Court for habeas corpus relief from a decision of the United States Parole Commission that petitioner should be “continued to expiration” —in other words, that he should be denied parole.
Petitioner was convicted of (1) conspiracy to distribute cocaine, (2) conspiracy to distribute heroin, (3) conspiracy to distribute marijuana, and (4) conspiracy to manufacture and distribute heroin, knowing it would be imported into the United States. Petitioner received concurrent sentences on *918these four convictions, and was remanded to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Meynardo Montemayor and Manuel MontemayorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Harold Martin Brest v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Director, Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Spring-Field, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Richard L. Dye v. United States Parole Commission, United States of America, and United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Elias Nunez-Guardado v. John T. Hadden, and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Montemayor (Meynardo) v. Martin (t.c.), U.S. Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987