Legal Opinion

Cub Cadet Corp. v. Mopec, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2002No. WD 59963PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

Cub Cadet Corporation filed suit seeking a deficiency judgment and fraud damages against Mopec Corporation and its principals/guarantors, Russell and Shirley Martin, 1 after Cub Cadet repossessed and sold Mopec’s inventory of outdoor equipment that was supplied by Cub Cadet. Relying on the Southern District’s opinion in Textron Financial Corp. v. Trailiner Corp., 965 S.W.2d 426, 431-32 (Mo.App. S.D.1998), motion for rehearing and application for transfer denied, the trial court held that Cub Cadet’s failure to plead proper notice of sale under section 400-9.504(8) RSMo…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Sermchief v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Kilbane v. Director of the Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. Gateway Aviation, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Gross v. Merchants-Produce BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shelton v. SargentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Haden v. David J. Sacks, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2009
  3. Nalle Plastics Family Limited Partnership v. Porter, Rogers, Dahlman & Gordon, P.C. and Patrick P. Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2013
  4. Hasty v. Keller HCP Partners, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Stark v. Benckenstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API