Legal Opinion

State v. Barrise

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 9, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KOLE, J. A. D.

In our opinion of November 14,1979 we remanded this matter for a plenary hearing and findings on the issue of whether the State had provided a “satisfactory explanation” for the 40-day delay in sealing the tapes obtained during the wiretap. See State v. Cerbo, 78 N.J. 595 (1979) (hereafter Cerbo). We reserved for determination the questions of whether defendants *551had waived their right to raise the sealing requirement issue at trial by not incorporating it in their pretrial motions to suppress and whether Cerbo should be applied to this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. CzachorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. United States v. Pasquale Falcone Appeal of Pasquale Falconio in No. 73-2013. Appeal of Wally Berger in No. 73-2109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Alphonse SiscaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. HowerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. State v. KeeganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  3. State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. State v. BursteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API