Legal Opinion

Nathaniel E. Shelton v. United States of America, Robert B. Pannell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 26, 1965No. 18793, 18794PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants were convicted, on strong evidence, of housebreaking, defined in 22 D.C.Code § 1801, and were sentenced under the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5010(c) (1958). The only contention for reversal which we need discuss is that at their preliminary hearing before the United States Commissioner appellants were without counsel or adequate advice with respect to counsel. It is the Commissioner’s duty and in some circumstances it may be essential to the validity of a subsequent conviction, to afford indigent accused who are without counsel the assistance of counsel at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. William D. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  2. William Andrew Washington v. Donald ClemmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. George T. C. Lollar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Willie Bell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. George E. Ross, Jr. v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Calvin C. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API