Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. 19675 Hasse

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2003No. Docket Nos. 237995, 238269-238338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In these seventy-one consolidated appeals, we decide whether a statute of limitations bars plaintiff city of Detroit’s actions to foreclose tax liens on several parcels of real property owned by defendant Acorn Investment Company1 for unpaid tax bills dating back as far as 1989. Because statutes of limitations do not run against the state or its subdivisions without an express legislative enactment, and because the Legislature has not enacted a statute of limitations for in rem foreclosure actions, we hold that no statute of limitations barred the city’s actions. We also conclude that the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Thompson v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Detroit v. 19675 HasseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API