Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Toanone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1989No. 2266PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order suppressing evidence relating to the charge that Philip N. Toanone operated a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. We reverse.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. On January 8, 1987, at approximately 8:30 P.M., Officer Donahue of the Springfield Township Police was waiting in his police car at a traffic light on Baltimore Pike when he was approached by Mr. Gerald Plasmeier. Mr. Plasmeier stated that the car he was driving had just been struck by a white Lincoln Continental which was also waiting at the traffic…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MannionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. RevieraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. RaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API