Legal Opinion
Glazier v. Harris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 2, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*404The complaint states a cause of action for defamation as against defendants Harris and St. John’s Lutheran Church since it is pleaded with the required specificity (CPLR 3016 [a]), identifying “the particular words that were said, who said them and who heard them, when the speaker said them, and where the words were spoken” (Amaranth LLC v J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., 71 AD3d 40, 48 [2009], lv dismissed in part and denied in part 14 NY3d 736 [2010]). That every alleged defamatory statement set forth in the complaint is not enclosed in quotation marks does not, without more, render the complaint…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Amaranth LLC v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Guerrero v. CarvaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- BCRE 230 Riverside v. FuchsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Moreira-Brown v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Touch Concepts, Inc. v. Cellco PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- BDCM Fund Adviser, L.L.C. v. ZenniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- BDCM Fund Adviser, L.L.C. v. ZenniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013