Legal Opinion

Surf and Sand, Inc. v. Gardebring

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1990No. C3-90-236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Presiding Judge.

The trial court found appellant’s breach of contract claims to be res judicata under this court’s prior affirmance of a Department of Human Services’ ruling which required appellant to “pay back” monies to the Department of Human Services. Appellant alleges that this finding was erroneous. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Surf and Sand, Inc. is a nursing home certified to participate in the federal Medicaid program. Medicaid is administered at the state level via Minnesota’s medical assistance program, which is run by respondent Department of Human Services (DHS). In…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peterson Ex Rel. Peterson v. Independent School District No. 811District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Fort Snelling State Park Ass'n v. Minneapolis Park & Recreation BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API