See v. Partridge
The Superior Court of New York City
Appeal by defendant from a judgment at special term, in favor of-the plaintiff» for $1,228,10, with costs. The action was tried before Bosworth, J,, at a special term, on the 28th May, 1853, The nature of the controversy, the questions raised and decided, and the exceptions taken, sufficiently appear in the statement of facts found, and in the opinion delivered by him.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant from a judgment at special term, in favor of-the plaintiff» for $1,228,10, with costs. The action was tried before Bosworth, J,, at a special term, on the 28th May, 1853, The nature of the controversy, the questions raised and decided, and the exceptions taken, sufficiently appear in the statement of facts found, and in the opinion delivered by him. The judgment of the court, at special term, embracing the facts as found, is as follows; On the 6th February, the plaintiffs, of the one part, who were carpenters and partners under the partnership name of See & Brown, entered…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
We think that all the questions that have been argued before us were rightly decided by the judge at special term ; and we deem it unnecessary to state any reasons for our opinion, in addition to those which he has given. He might, with entire propriety, have left the parties to bear separately their own costs, but the mode in which he has exercised his discretion in relation to the costs, is not an error, if an error at all, of which the defendant has any right to complain. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed with costs.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson v. Pickwick Associated Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1889
- Towle v. JonesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
- Towle v. JonesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863