Legal Opinion

Gerald Buchheit, Jr. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 19, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00171Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION GERALD BUCHHEIT, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:26-cv-171-SPC-KRH THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company’s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 15). Plaintiff Gerald Buchheit, Jr., responded (Doc. 17), and Defendant replied. (Doc. 23). For the reasons below, the motion is granted. This is an insurance recovery action. Defendant provided a homeowner’s insurance policy (“Policy”) to Plaintiff for his property in Fort Myers (“Property”). After the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC v. Peerless Network, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  5. Brush v. Miami Beach Healthcare Group Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API