Kinder v. Berryhill
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND
CHARLES F. EICK, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs and Defendant’s motions for summary judgment are denied, and this matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with this Opinion.
PROCEEDINGS
On August 31, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking review of the Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits. On January 17, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. On February 15, 2017, Defendant filed a “Memorandum' in Support of Defendant’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kovach v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019