Legal Opinion

Amann v. Office of the Utah Attorney General

District Court, D. Utah

Decided May 7, 2025No. 2:18-cv-00341Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH PAUL G. AMANN, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING AND Plaintiff, PARTIALLY DENYING THE PARTIES’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE v. Case No. 2:18-cv-00341-JNP-DAO OFFICE OF THE UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL, District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendant. Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Before the court are motions in limine filed by Plaintiff Paul G. Amann (“Plaintiff” or “Amann”), ECF Nos. 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 428, and Defendant Office of the Utah Attorney General (“the Attorney General’s Office” or “Defendant”), ECF Nos. 413, 414, 415,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Cesareo-AyalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API