Hansell-Elcock Foundry Co. v. Clark
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes
One contention of appellant’s counsel is that the court committed reversible error in permitting the plaintiff to file an amended declaration after the verdict, and in this connection they say that “ the only declaration submitted to the jury was that of March 18, 1903.” This was an amended declaration filed after the trial commenced. That the trial was on this declaration cannot be successfully controverted. It took the place of ali other previous declarations. Mo objection was made to its filing, nor to proceeding with the trial after it was filed without a plea on the part of appellant. We…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of LaSalle v. KostkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Margaret HouseIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Ross v. ShanleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Malott v. HoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.