Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 3, 1979No. 53405PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and dispensed with oral argument pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320. After careful consideration of the briefs and record, we have determined that conflict was dispelled by Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978), thereby leaving this Court without jurisdiction. Accordingly, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Linder v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 342 So.2d 474 (Fla.1977); Florida East Coast Railway v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Company v. RouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. RouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Weedman v. Sunland Roller Rink, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palmes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Donovan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. State v. PrietoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Sosa v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API