Frederick v. Unum Life Insurance
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOLLOY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff, joined by defendant, asks that the scheduled March 22, 1999 trial date in this *385ease be vacated and that the scheduling order be amended to extend all deadlines “by at least six (6) months.” (Motion to Continue, pg. 1). The reason put forth in support of the motion is that discovery issues “have arisen which have significantly delayed discovery in this matter which will prevent the parties from being prepared to proceed to trial on March 22, 1999 as presently scheduled.” (Motion to Continue, pg. 2). The motion is denied.
II. Discussion
Counsel…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. Bd. of County Com'rs County of FremontDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- Active Products Corp. v. A.H. Choitz & Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paul Revere Life Insurance v. JafariDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002