Legal Opinion
Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. Uss-Posco Industries
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 13, 2015No. 13-15475PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal, which centers on tin mill products used to make the tin cans commonly used to package food, teaches that there’s no substitute for concrete evidence. Stanislaus Food Products Company claims that it pays artificially high prices as the result of an illegal market allocation agreement among the nation’s leading tin manufacturers who agreed to cede the tin mill products market in the western United States to a single company, USS-POSCO Industries (“UPI”).
Although echoes of price-fixing permeate the appeal, only a market allocation theory is at issue.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kleen Prods. LLC v. Georgia-Pacific LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Dairy v. Dairy Employees Union Local No. 17 Christian Labor Ass'n of the United States of America Pension TrustDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Honey Bum, LLC v. Fashion Nova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Bartlett v. BP West Coast Products LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Home Depot U.S.A., Inc v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.