Legal Opinion
James v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 27, 2007No. CV05-04106-PCT-NVWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NEIL V. WAKE, District Judge.
The court has before it Third Party Plaintiff Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company’s (“BNSF’s” or “Railroad’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. #82), and supporting Statement of Facts (“BSOF”) (doc. # 83); Third Party Defendant A-Ceco Equipment Company’s (“A-Ceco’s”) Response (doc. # 108) and supporting Statement of Facts (“ASOF”) (doc. # 109); and the Reply (doc. # 119).
The Motion will be denied because there is a disputed issue of material fact as to whether Arizona’s anti-indemnity statute, A.R.S. § 32-1159, voids A-Ceco’s promise to indemnify,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thornhill Publishing Company, Inc. v. General Telephone & Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- John L. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- James v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RY. CO.District Court, D. Arizona · 2007