Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cahill v. Leopold

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 15, 1954Published

1DissentInglis, C. J.

I am unable to agree with the majority of the court either in their conclusion that the “completion” of the seventeenth census occurred prior to the opening of the 1951 session of the General Assembly or in their conclusion that the thirty-first amendment precludes redistricting by any session of the General Assembly except the one next after the completion of a census.

The thirty-first amendment provides that the senatorial districts, after they are once established, “shall not be altered, nor the number of senators altered, except at a session of the general assembly next after the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. CunningamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  3. People Ex Rel. Carter v. . RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Jones v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Jones v. Commissioners.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API