Shacocass, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Judge.
This appeal arises from a dispute over the technical specifications in a construction subcontract. The subcontractor seeks compensation for additional work allegedly made necessary by ambiguities in the specifications and arbitrary actions by the other contractors on the project. The district court entered summary judgment against the subcontractor. Today we affirm.
The background facts may be summarized briefly. On a site located within the boundaries of the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL), the United States Department of Energy disposes of nuclear waste. A…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Steiner Corp. v. American District TelegraphIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Gilbert v. City of CaldwellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vanderford Co., Inc. v. KnudsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Puckett v. Oakfabco, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Baker v. BorenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
- Johnson v. City of HomedaleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. HardmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.