Weadock v. Champe
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Gage, J. Assumpsit by G. Leo Weadoek -against Elizabeth Champe for breach of contract for the sale of real estate. Judgment for plaintiff; Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
This is an action in assumpsit to recover damages for the breach of a contract alleged to have been made by the defendant to sell and convey certain premises to the plaintiff. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff of $6,000.
At the time of the alleged contract, the defendant owned certain premises in lots 7 and 8 of block 34 of Hoyt's subdivision in the city of Saginaw, situate on the south side of Genesee avenue between Washington avenue and Franklin street. On it were situate two brick blocks, the westerly one Nos. 214 and 216 Genesee…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hendricks v. . StarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Ingals v. PlamondonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Tuthill v. KatzMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Schaefer v. . BlumenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mary Jane Stevens Co. v. First Nat. Bldg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
- Heartland Community Bank v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
- Beechler v. ByerlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Cameron v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Levinson v. GoodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.