Legal Opinion

Roush v. Pari-Mutuel Commission

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1996No. 95-133PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The issues in this case are the progeny of the absolute insurer rule found in the rules of the Wyoming Pari-Mutuel Commission (Commission). Charles C. Roush (Roush) was fined by the Commission, the winner’s purse was forfeited, and his racing license was suspended because a horse he raced tested positive for an illegal drug, methyl-phenidate. The primary issue is whether the absolute insurer rule can be invoked by the Commission because of a failure to establish a proper foundation for the introduction of the result of a drug test that triggered the rule. In addition, Roush…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Devous v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. L.U. Sheep Co. v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Morris v. West Virginia Racing CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gilchrist v. BierringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Fallon v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Aspen Ridge Law Offices, P.C. v. Wyoming Department of EmploymentWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Slagle v. Wyoming State Board of NursingWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Worker's Compensation Claim of Morris v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API