Nobles v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of capital murder. Y.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 19.03(a)(2). Following the jury’s return of affirmative answers to the submitted special issues 1 , the trial judge then assessed the required punishment of death by lethal injection. Appellant presents eight points of error in his direct appeal. We will affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence either to support his conviction or to support the jury’s affirmative answers to the special issues. Rather, appellant asserts various challenges to the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Prystash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Rojas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.