Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. Samuel Sanchez

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 27, 2014No. Docket Kno-13-166PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] In this appeal, Samuel Sanchez asks us to vacate a judgment entered by the court {Horton, J.), after a bench trial, convicting him of criminal trespass (Class E), 17-A M.R.S. § 402(1)(E) (2013), for entering a Rite Aid store six months after a police officer ordered him not to be on the premises. Sanchez argues that the court erred in finding that the officer was authorized, within the meaning of section 402(1)(E), to order him not to enter the premises. We affirm the court’s judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] On February 5, 2013, Sanchez was charged by complaint with criminal trespass. See…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Holland v. SebunyaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. State v. ArdolinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. State of Maine v. Thomas P. WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  5. State v. GordonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Karl v. KittredgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  2. State of Maine v. Kristina I. LoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. State of Maine v. Wayne I. HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. State of Maine v. Bradley R. AtkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  5. State v. ProiaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API