Legal Opinion

Jim Bensman, Mark Donham and Heartwood, Incorporated v. United States Forest Service and Randy Moore

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 2, 2005No. 03-4041PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

Through its employees, Mark Donham and Jim Bensman, Heartwood, Inc., an Indiana nonprofit concerned with preserving the national forests, commented on several projects of the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service” or “the Service”). When notified of the decision of the Service with respect to these projects, it sought, through the same employees, to file an appeal in each of those matters. In filing its appeals, Heartwood relied upon the Service’s statement as to the due date for the filings. That statement was wrong; the appeals were a day late, and the Service…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Christine Bryant v. Compass Group U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Sierra Club v. Franklin County Power of Illinois, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Shameca Robertson v. Allied Solutions, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Wilderness Society, Inc. v. ReyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Sierra Club v. Department of TransportationHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API