Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 5, 2023No. 0:21-cv-00679Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Raul Diaz, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER Case No. 21-cv-679 (MJD/JFD) Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant. Brenna Karrer, Chase Hedrick, Zachary Schmoll, Fields Law Firm, for Plaintiff. Margaret Santos, Daniel Ryan, Margaret Gokhberg, Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, for Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Raul Diaz brought this Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) action against Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”) after MetLife determined that Diaz was no longer entitled to benefits under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alton Cash v. Wal-Mart Group Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Amini v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.