Legal Opinion

Seidenbach's v. Denney

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 9, 1943No. 30872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs, individuals comprising a copartnership of Denney and Denney, who will be referred to hereinafter as plaintiffs, filed an action on open account against Seidenbach’s, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant, for a balance due of $298.90. The original account was alleged to be $691.81. It is further alleged that $392.91 was paid thereon, leaving due the balance prayed.

It is alleged that the account duly verified was attached to the petition as exhibit A. The account was not verified. The defendant denied generally any indebtedness because of the facts alleged in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hart Grocery Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Rosser v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Burford v. Richards & Conover Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Cain v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Seidenbach's v. Titus Radio Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frankfurt v. BunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Paul v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API