Legal Opinion

Romano v. Browne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 18, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about February 28, 1991, denying the motion by defendants-appellants George N. Browne, William Roberts and Leonard Holzer, Doing Business as New 40 Rector Street Company, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion granted, without costs and disbursements.

Plaintiff Romano, an employee of Pritchard Services Inc., commenced this negligence action to recover for injuries sustained when she tripped on an electrical wire while cleaning the offices of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guzman v. Haven Plaza Housing Development Fund Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Manning v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. O'Rourke v. Sachel Hardware, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. DelaCruz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Pledger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santiago v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API