State v. Noggle
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
What Dale Noggle is accused of doing is wrong in the eyes of his profession and in the eyes of society. What Dale Noggle is accused of doing, however, is not considered a criminal wrong by the state of Ohio. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the court of appeals.
Consensual sexual conduct between persons over sixteen years of age, as was apparently the situation in this case, is generally legal in Ohio. The intent of R.C. 2907.03 is to forbid sexual conduct in a variety of situations where the offender takes unconscionable advantage of the victim. The complete list of situations stated in…
2Cited by27 opinions
- State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Mole (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Asberry v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- In re BonfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re BonfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.