Legal Opinion

Hollman v. Woolfson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 3, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2012-210888; No. 27280Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pleicones

This is a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of a motion for entry of a ruling on a motion for reconsideration and from the trial court’s underlying order denying a motion for rule to show cause, for sanctions, and for modification of a protective order. We reverse.

FACTS

In 1999 and 2001, John Hollman underwent three laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eye surgeries performed by physician employees of TLC Laser Eye Centers (Piedmont/Atlanta), LLC, and TLC The Laser Center (Institute), Inc. (appellants). In the next several years, his vision deteriorated. In 2007, he filed an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miles v. MilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Davis v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Hollman v. WoolfsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. City of North Myrtle Beach v. East Cherry Grove Realty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API