Legal Opinion

Transamerica Insurance Group v. Maytag, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1994No. 16775PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillin, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Transamerica Insurance Group (“Transamerica”), appeals from the trial court’s order which dismissed Transamerica’s complaint against appellees, Maytag Corporation, Inc. (“Maytag”) and Fretter, Inc. (“Fretter”) as a sanction for spoliation of evidence. We reverse.

This case arises out of a fire which caused damage to the home of Ronald and Carol Kane. Transamerica insured the Kanes’ home and its contents against fire loss. Transamerica paid the Kanes for their loss under the insurance policy and hired professional engineer Richard Kovarsky to investigate the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russo v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Evans v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howell v. MaytagDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Loukinas v. Roto-Rooter Services Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. American States Insurance v. Tokai-Seiki (H.K.), Ltd.Miami County Court of Common Pleas · 1997
  4. Hetzer-Young v. Elano Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Altercare, Inc. v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API