Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided December 2, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Honorable Pierce,

The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect:

Do the provisions of the Improvement District Act, codified at 11 O.S. 39-101 et seq. (1981), as amended in 1983, and in particular 11 O.S. 39-110(E), authorize a school district to pay for special assessments:

1. by levying a tax in excess of the number of mills which may be levied pursuant to Okla. Const. Article X, Section 9; or

2. by levying a tax through its sinking fund?

Your question addresses the means by which a school district may budget for and finance local improvements made…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Wilson v. City of HollisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Oklahoma County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Hatfield v. MorelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. CasadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API