Legal Opinion
Leary v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 14, 1995PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
At issue is whether salary earned out of State is “regular compensation” within the meaning of G. L. c. 32, § 5 (2) (a) (1994 ed.). An administrative magistrate ruled in favor of the plaintiff, William J. Leary, but the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (CRAB), relying on the defi*345nitions of “employee” and “regular compensation” in G. L. c. 32, § 1 (1994 ed.), affirmed the Teachers’ Retirement Board’s (TRB) refusal to consider the out-of-State salary figures. A Superior Court judge affirmed CRAB’s decision. We transferred the case here on our own motion. We affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Hoffman v. Howmedica, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Hartford Insurance v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Negron v. GordonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- State Board of Retirement v. Boston Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Casseus v. E. Bus Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. RahimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Massachusetts Broken Stone Co. v. Town of WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Bulger v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Boone v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.