New York Filter Co. v. Schwarzwalder
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. Bill by the New York Filter Company against Henry Sehwarzwalder and August Finck, users, and the O. H. Jewell Filter Company, manufacturer, to restrain the infringement of letters patent. Motion by the O. H. Jewell Filter Company to restrain the complainant from issuing circulars to defendant’s customers, asserting the complainant’s exclusive right, and stating that he intends to enforce the same.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The New York Filter Company is the owner of letters patent No. 293,740, issued February it), Í884, to Isaiah S. Hyatt, for an improvement in the art of filtration.’ It has brought suit in this circuit (March, 1893) against the defendants Sehwarzwalder & Finck, proprietors of the Murray Hill Baths, in the city of New York, for infringement of the patent. The alleged infringing apparatus was bought by these defendants from its manufacturers, the O. H. Jewell Filter Company, a corporation created under the laws of the state of Illinois. By consent of the original parties,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Birdsell v. Hagerstown Agr. Imp. Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1877
3Cited by8 opinions
- Asbestos Shingle, Slate & Sheathing Co. v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
- Commercial Acetylene Co. v. Avery Portable Lighting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1906
- Mitchell v. International Tailoring Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
- Hanson v. Hall Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. Empire Rubber & Tire Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.