Legal Opinion
United Rope Distributors, Inc. v. Kimberly Line
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 8, 1991No. 89 Civ. 1166 (MGC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
Seatriumph Marine Corporation (“Seatriumph”) moves to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff United Rope Distributors is a Delaware Corporation with its principal place of business in Minnesota. Defendant and third-party plaintiff Kim-Sail, Ltd. ("Kim-Sail”) is a Cayman Islands corporation with its principal place of business in New York City. 1 Third-party defendant Seatriumph is a Liberian corporation with its principal place of business in Greece.
BACKGROUND
At the time of the events giving rise to this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Landoil Resources Corp. v. Alexander & Alexander Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- NationsBank, N.A. v. MacOil, Inc. (In Re Med-Atlantic Petroleum Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- United Rope Distributors, Inc. v. Kimberly LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Mones v. Commercial Bank of Kuwait S.A.K.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007