Legal Opinion

Estate of Adams v. Nurnberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

In passing upon the order under review, it suffices to note the following facts : In the proceedings administering the estate in. question, the county court entered an order fixing and limiting the period up to August 6, 1935, as the time within which creditors were to present their claims. There was no extension of that period, and on December 12, 1935, the court either allowed or disallowed the claims which had been filed. On December 2, 1935, John H. Leenhouts, as assessor of incomes, served on the executors notice of a *239proposed additional assessment for income taxes on income received by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Bogue v. LaughlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Banking Commission v. MuzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Metzger v. Wisconsin Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. GoldfarbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. State v. Estate of CrockerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. In Re Estate of CarlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API