Legal Opinion

Splain v. B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 4, 1923No. 3876PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

One Hartmann, a retail dealer in automobile tires in Washington, was indebted to Fisk Rubber Company and B. F. Goodrich Rubber Company for tires purchased from them. Finding himself unable to pay his bills when they became due, he, on the 10th day of September, 1920, made an agreement with the Goodrich Company to return the tires which he had purchased from it at a price to be later agreed upon, which price was to be credited upon his bill. Shortly afterwards, on the same day, the Fisk Company caused to be levied a writ of attachment upon all the property in the Hartmann…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Hamilton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Campbell v. WillisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Barlow v. LanglandsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API