Legal Opinion

Barlow v. Langlands

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1955No. 1566Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant Barlow having secured judgment against Frost caused execution to issue and the marshal seized an automobile registered in Maryland in Frost’s name. Appellee Langlands filed a petition claiming that the seized automobile was his property. 1 This appeal is from a judgment in Langlands’ favor.

The chronology of the various events is as follows. In 1952 Frost had the automobile registered in his name in the District of Columbia, but on April 19, 1954, he registered it in Maryland. On June 2, 1954, Barlow filed suit against Frost who was-served with process on June…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fogle v. General Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Higgins v. Central Cigar Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  3. Hume v. RiggsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
  4. Cutler v. CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Splain v. B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API