Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Route 21 Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Route 21 Associates and Max Finkelstein, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Belen, J.), dated November 8, 1995, which denied their motion for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint and cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellants, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff, employed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wolczak v. National Electric Products Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Huston v. Hayden Building Maintenance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Izzo v. Linpro Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  4. Bozza v. BurgenerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. MunizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Marchevka v. DeBartola Capital PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. GrassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API