Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Damerell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hancock county; the Hon. Joseph Sibley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

These were two actions, one in the name of Emanuel, and the other in that of Robert Damerell, as plaintiffs, to recover for damages from a collision on the railroad of the defendant

The actions were consolidated in the court below, and a verdict and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant appealed.

The principal facts are: That on April 7, 1875, about 10-o’clock A. M., at the railroad crossing of a public highway between West Point and Stillwell, and one and a half miles south of West Point, a passenger train upon defendant’s railroad, going south, came in collision with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aurora Branch Railroad v. GrimesIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  2. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. StillIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HazzardIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. McGrath v. . N.Y. Cen. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute R. R. v. ManlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gulf, M. & O.R. Co. v. FreundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Willett v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  3. Morgan v. Rockford, Beloit & Janesville Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  4. Burns v. Chicago & Alton RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921
  5. Lamarre v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API