Legal Opinion

St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute R. R. v. Manly

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1871PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. Joseph Gillespie, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This was an action instituted by the appellee against the appellant, to recover for personal injuries to himself and to his property, resulting from a collision of the train as the appellee was about to cross the track of appellant’s road, which injuries, it is alleged, were occasioned by the negligence and unskillfulness of the agents and servants of the company.

The accident occurred in July, 1866, within the corporate limits of the town of Bunker Hill. The appellee resided in the town, and had for some six years previous to the accident, and was familiar with the railroad crossings in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Galena & Chicago Union Railroad v. JacobsIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Aurora Branch Railroad v. GrimesIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Galena & Chicago Union R. R. v. FayIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. McKeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Dyer v. TalcottIllinois Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tanner's v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. McMechen v. McMechenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Baker v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API