Legal Opinion

Heckel v. Burtchaell

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 19, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

7 N.J. Super. 203 (1950)

72 A.2d 794

WILLIAM HECKEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOSEPH L. BURTCHAELL, AND (MARY) BURTCHAELL, FIRST NAME (MARY) BEING FICTITIOUS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 10, 1950.

Decided April 19, 1950.

Before Judges JACOBS, DONGES and BIGELOW.

Mr. Joseph L. Burtchaell, attorney pro se.

Mr. Harry J. Diamond, attorney for plaintiff-respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DONGES, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff in the Mercer County District Court.

The controversy in this case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spiccia v. Paterson Silk Throwing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  2. Roberts v. RemlingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hertz Washmobile System v. South OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. Naylor v. ConroyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. CONTRERAS v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  4. Mercner v. FayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API