Legal Opinion

United States v. Frederick Keith Singleton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1997No. 95-5841PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed in part and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge MOTZ joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

During the course of his criminal trial, Frederick Singleton sought to fire his court-appointed counsel because he was “not satisfied” with the way his counsel was cross-examining witnesses. When the court indicated the benefits of counsel, advising Singleton that he would be held strictly to the rules of court, Singleton sought to have counsel remain to assist him as a “legal adviser.” After being told by the court that it would not…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. State v. HesterTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. United States v. MoussaouiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Clinton Bernard Frazier-ElCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Watkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  5. United States v. Darryl Lamont JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API