Legal Opinion

(PC) Chiprez v. Warden

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 18, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00668Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESUS CHIPREZ, Case No. 1:21-cv-00668-DAD-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THE FEDERAL CLAIMS BE 13 v. DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 14 WARDEN, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND THE COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE 15 Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER STATE LAW CLAIM 16 (ECF No. 15) 17 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 19 Plaintiff Jesus Chiprez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API