Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. (“GBT”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. 1 The district court granted summary judgment against GBT’s claim that the defendants unlawfully conspired not to deal with GBT in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. For the following reasons, we affirm.
I
Golden Bridge Technology (“GBT”) develops wireless communications technology for cellular networks. Along with the Ap-pellees, GBT is a member of a non-profit standard setting organization called Third Generation Partnership…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fabela v. Socorro Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Marucci Sports, LLC v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Chaney v. Dreyfus Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.