Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Baxter

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

EROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Davidson County. AndRew Allison. Ch.

1Opinion of the Court

A. D. Bright, Sp. J.

The defendant, Baxter, the then owner of the lots described in the pleadings, employed plaintiff, Thompson, as supervising architect, to draw plans, specifications, solicit bids for, *306and supervise the construction of the building and erection of the house on same known as “ Baxter Court” and “Baxter Court Hotel.” The complainant alleges he is an architect, residing in Nashville. He now, by his bill, alleges that he is entitled to a mechanics’ lien on said house and lot for .his services, or compensationi for services, rendered as such supervising architect, under §§ 2739…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southern Const. Co. v. HalliburtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Central Trust Co. v. George Lueders & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  3. Pillow v. KellyTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Chickasaw Hotel Co. v. C. B. Barker Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Harris v. MarableTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API