Legal Opinion
Allstate Indemnity Company v. Vina Stump
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1999No. 97-35822PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
191 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 1999)
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
VINA STUMP, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HAROLD STUMP; VERNON THE BOY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF VICTOR THE BOY; AND ARTHUR WINDY BOY, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBAL COURT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ONLY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 97-35822
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Argued September 16, 1998
Submission deferred September 28, 1998
Resubmitted January 8, 1999
August 19, 1999
As amended Sept. 13, 1999.
Mikel L. Moore, Christensen, Moore, Cockrell &…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Iowa Mutual Insurance v. LaPlanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Strate v. A-1 ContractorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. NeztsosieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fortino Alvarez v. Randy TracyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014