Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Orwick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1989No. 55903-1PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J.—

Facts of Case

At issue in this case is whether charges against a defendant should be dismissed because the defendant was denied immediate access to counsel.

At approximately 9:25 p.m. on November 7, 1985, two Seattle police officers responded to a car-pedestrian accident. On approaching the accident scene, one officer saw John Orwick, the defendant herein, leave the sidewalk and lie on top of the unconscious accident victim. The officer said that when he asked the defendant if he was giving aid to the victim, the defendant responded "no". After repeatedly asking the defendant to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. LaureanoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. FitzsimmonsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. City of Tacoma v. HeaterWashington Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API