Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Fishbein

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1932No. 30,345PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*834The opinion of the court was.delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one for damages for libel. A motion for judgment for defendants on the pleadings was denied, and defendants appeal.

The petition alleged that plaintiff is a regularly licensed physician engaged in the practice of medicine in Geary county, Kansas, and that Fishbein is the editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association, in control of the matter published in the Journal. Paragraph Y of the petition reads as follows:

“That on or about January 14, 1928, the e^act date which is unknown to plaintiff, the said Morris Fishbein…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SeimillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Reardon v. News-Journal CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  4. Steenson v. WallaceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Henderson v. RippergerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API