Legal Opinion

Henry Quellmalz Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Hays

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, 0. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is not claimed that Luther Denton had any authority, express or implied, to call upon bystanders to help him in the discharge of any service which he could reasonably perform. If a third person undertook, at his request, to help him in performing his duties as ginner, when no emergency or pressing necessity existed, such third person would, in the eyes of the law, be deemed a volunteer, and the defendant would owe him no higher duty than to refrain from injuring him after he discovered his peril. It is claimed, however, by counsel for the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Railroad Co. v. DialSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  3. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. KernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bogart v. HesterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dorton v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Larson v. Independent School District No. 11JIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Booth & Flynn v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. Transport Co. of Texas v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API