Port Hill Natural Gas Authority v. City of Easley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in interpreting the Fort Hill Natural Gas Authority (hereinafter “Authority”) enabling act as requiring all profits not contracted for or under covenant to be disbursed to the Authority’s member towns. We affirm.
FACTS
The Fort Hill Natural Gas Authority was created by the legislature in 1952.1952 S.C. Acts 799 (hereinafter “Act”). At that time, the Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company maintained a transmission line extending through northwestern South Carolina. The towns of Easley, Liberty, Central, Clemson,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Independence Ins. v. Independent Life & Acc. Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Martin v. EllisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Kleckley v. PulliamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Manufacturers Finance Acceptance Corp. v. BramlettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
3Cited by1 opinion
- Trustees of Grace Reformed Episcopal Church v. Charleston InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1994