Legal Opinion

Port Hill Natural Gas Authority v. City of Easley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 1, 1993No. 23789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in interpreting the Fort Hill Natural Gas Authority (hereinafter “Authority”) enabling act as requiring all profits not contracted for or under covenant to be disbursed to the Authority’s member towns. We affirm.

FACTS

The Fort Hill Natural Gas Authority was created by the legislature in 1952.1952 S.C. Acts 799 (hereinafter “Act”). At that time, the Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company maintained a transmission line extending through northwestern South Carolina. The towns of Easley, Liberty, Central, Clemson,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Independence Ins. v. Independent Life & Acc. Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Martin v. EllisorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Kleckley v. PulliamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Manufacturers Finance Acceptance Corp. v. BramlettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trustees of Grace Reformed Episcopal Church v. Charleston InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API